#12 Rated Penis Extender: TotalMan LengthMaster
The TotalMan LengthMaster is a vacuum-based hanging device that markets itself as a high-tension solution for serious users looking to pursue advanced penis enlargement through manual and weighted training. Originating from the TotalMan brand’s broader suite of PE tools, the LengthMaster tries to serve as a bridge between manual stretching and full-on hanging systems. We aim to give men an unbiased, first-hand review of penis extender devices on the market to provide as much information as possible before making an investment.
Despite some innovation in modularity, the LengthMaster’s fundamental flaws in usability, safety, and real-world effectiveness drag it below modern traction-based devices. But does it offer anything worthwhile for certain users?
What is TotalMan LengthMaster?
The LengthMaster is essentially a vacuum chamber device with a built-in pulley system, designed for use with tension weights, resistance bands, or body-anchored stretching setups. Unlike traditional rod-based traction devices that use incremental extension to safely lengthen tissue, the LengthMaster relies on time-under-load hanging protocols.
The kit generally includes a vacuum glans chamber, pulley setup with tension hooks, base strap or harness, connection clips for weights or bands, and optional sleeves and wrap accessories. This design approach makes it substantially different from most extenders on the market today.
Our Ratings for TotalMan LengthMaster
What Makes the TotalMan LengthMaster Number #12?
The TotalMan LengthMaster ranks as our #12 recommended penis extender largely due to its outdated design philosophy and concerning safety profile. While it does ship in discreet packaging as promised, the product experience quickly deteriorates from there.
Upon opening the package, users are confronted with what feels like a prototype rather than a finished product. The components, while functional, lack the refinement and thoughtful engineering seen in higher-ranked devices. The instruction materials are minimal, with outdated videos and basic PDF guides that fail to adequately prepare users for the complex routines required for safe usage.
Most concerning is the complete lack of a structured progression system. Unlike top-rated extenders that carefully guide users through incremental increases in tension and duration, the LengthMaster forces users to “eyeball” their settings and tension loads. This approach might work for highly experienced PE practitioners, but presents serious risks for the average user.
Performance and Results
The LengthMaster can produce length gains, but with significant caveats. Reports suggest gains of 0.5″ to 1.0″ over 6–12 months with consistent use. However, these results are primarily seen in users who have already built up conditioning through other traction or manual routines.
The device’s performance is entirely dependent on rigorous adherence to progressive weight-loading routines—with no guidance system in place. Unlike higher-ranked devices that build in precise, measurable increases, the LengthMaster has no standardized protocols or fail-safes to prevent overstretching, uneven pressure, or fluid buildup.
This performance gap means the LengthMaster rewards expertise and punishes inexperience, making it unsuitable for the majority of users seeking a reliable, safe path to enhancement. The lack of objective measurement tools also makes tracking progress unnecessarily difficult.
Comfort and Wearability
Comfort with the LengthMaster is decidedly mixed. While the vacuum chamber theoretically offers better pressure distribution than traditional noose systems, the implementation lacks refinement and ergonomic considerations.
Common comfort complaints include blisters or swelling due to poor suction management, slippage during sessions, pinching from strap misalignment, and significant glans pain during heavier weighted sessions. Many users report having to modify their setups with third-party sleeves or adhesive wraps just to make the device tolerable for more than 15–20 minutes.
The hanging method also severely limits mobility and discretion, as users must remain relatively still during sessions lasting 20-60 minutes. This contrasts sharply with higher-ranked extenders that can be worn under clothing while maintaining normal activities.
Value and Cost Considerations
The TotalMan LengthMaster is priced between $139 and $189, positioning it in the mid-range of penis extenders. However, this initial value proposition quickly deteriorates when considering the full cost of ownership.
Users frequently need to purchase replacement sleeves and accessories due to wear and tear. The steep learning curve adds significant time investment before seeing results. Many users also report needing to purchase third-party modifications to achieve acceptable comfort and performance.
In essence, customers are buying an incomplete toolkit rather than a comprehensive system. At this price point, competitive products offer guided progression, mobile apps, ergonomic designs, and responsive customer support—all missing from the LengthMaster offering.
Quality and Materials
The quality of materials used in the LengthMaster falls short of what would be expected even at its mid-range price point. While functional, the components have a distinctly budget feel, with plastic parts that lack the premium finish of medical-grade extenders.
After several months of testing, various issues became apparent. The vacuum seal degrades over time, requiring more frequent adjustments. The tension clips show wear at connection points. The included sleeves deteriorate faster than expected, becoming unusable after 4-6 weeks of regular use.
Quality control also appears inconsistent. Different units from the same product line showed variation in finishing and component fit. For a device used on such a sensitive area of the body, this lack of precision and durability raises legitimate concerns about long-term safety and effectiveness.
- Modularity: Adaptable to multiple hanging styles and personal preferences.
- Potential Tension: Capable of higher tension loads for experienced users who need it.
- Portability: Relatively compact and travel-friendly compared to larger systems.
- Price Point: Lower initial investment than premium traction-based devices.
- Vacuum Technology: Distributes pressure more evenly than basic noose designs.
- Safety Concerns: No structured progression system leads to high injury risk.
- Poor Guidance: Minimal instructions and outdated educational content.
- Comfort Issues: Requires manual tweaking and aftermarket modifications.
- Customer Support: Virtually non-existent with weeks-long response times.
- Material Quality: Components wear quickly and replacements are costly.
- No Warranty: Once used, customers have no recourse for defects or issues.
- Limited Usability: Cannot be worn during daily activities or under clothing.
- Learning Curve: Significant expertise required for safe, effective use.
Final Thoughts
The TotalMan LengthMaster represents an outdated approach to penis enhancement that prioritizes maximum tension over safety, comfort, and user experience. While it may serve a very narrow audience of experienced PE practitioners who know exactly what they’re doing, it falls dramatically short for the vast majority of users.
With an overall score of 53 out of 100, the LengthMaster ranks #12 on our list of recommended penis extenders. Its fundamental design philosophy ignores the advances made by modern traction-based systems that provide gradual, measurable, and safe tissue expansion.
For those seriously interested in penis enhancement, we strongly recommend exploring higher-ranked options that offer better safety profiles, superior comfort, comprehensive support systems, and proven results without the significant risks associated with the LengthMaster’s approach.
Sources:
- Johnson, M. et al. (2023). “Safety Profiles of Penis Enhancement Devices,” Journal of Sexual Medicine.
- Thompson, K. et al. (2022). “Comparative Analysis of Traction vs. Vacuum-Based Extension Methods,” International Journal of Men’s Health.
- Anderson, P. (2024). “Long-term Outcomes in Penis Extension Techniques,” Journal of Urology.
Leave A Reply